Optimum Material Selection for Battery Carrier System in Electric Buses

Main Article Content

Songül Kılınç
Özgür Özlü
Rana İmren
Öner Şimşir

Abstract

European Union has started to encourage countries to use public transportation in order to reduce air pollution and carbon emissions. Decreasing fossil fuel reserves make energy supply difficult. Vehicle exhaust emissions increase air pollution day by day. In this period when global warming is increasing in the global world, the transition to zero-emission electric vehicle production in public transportation has begun. Electric buses provide a clean, efficient and sustainable transportation alternative to diesel vehicles. One of the most important issues to consider in electric buses is the SoC (State of Charge) value of the battery, which is the range it will get from 0 to 100 when fully charged. Reducing weight in electric buses is one of the factors that increases the range value. For this reason, in the study, finite element analysis was carried out on the currently used battery carrier frame material EN10025 S355JR, alternatively aluminium 6061-T6, aluminium 7075-T6 and carbon fiber reinforced PEEK materials to lighten the vehicle weight. As a result of the analysis, 65.54% and 73.07% lightness were achieved with aluminum 6061-T6 and carbon fiber reinforced PEEK materials, respectively. When the analysis results were compared in terms of cost, manufacturability and lifetime, the most suitability for mass production was evaluated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kılınç, S., Özlü, Özgür ., İmren, R., & Şimşir, Öner. (2023). Optimum Material Selection for Battery Carrier System in Electric Buses. The European Journal of Research and Development, 3(4), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.56038/ejrnd.v3i4.359
Section
Articles

References

European Commission, 2018. 2030 climate and energy framework. URL https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/climate-strategies-targets/2030-climate-energy-framework_en [17.11.2023]

Jiang, J., & Zhang, C. (2015). Fundamentals and applications of lithium-ion batteries in electric drive vehicles. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118414798

Hjelkrem, O. A., Lervåg, K. Y., Babri, S., Lu, C., & Södersten, C. J. (2021). A battery electric bus energy consumption model for strategic purposes: Validation of a proposed model structure with data from bus fleets in China and Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 94, 102804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102804

Klink, G., Rouilloux, G., Wadivkar, O., & Znojek, B. (2012). Plastics. The Future for Automakers and Chemical Companies. AT Kearney Report.

King, J. (2007). The King Review of low-carbon cars: part I: the potential for CO2 reduction.

Watarai, H. (2006). Trend of Research and Development for Magnesium Alloys-Reducing the Weight of Structural Materialsin Motor Vehicles. NISTEP Science & Technology Foresight Center.

Ashley, S. (2016). Lightweight sandwich structures for EV chassis.

Nandhakumar, S., Seenivasan, S., Saalih, A. M., & Saifudheen, M. (2021). Weight optimization and structural analysis of an electric bus chassis frame. Materials Today: Proceedings, 37, 1824-1827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.404

http://www.drivingworkforcechange.org/reports/lightweightMaterials.pdf,[17.10.2023]

Wang, P. (2020). Effect of electric battery mass distribution on electric vehicle movement safety. Vibroengineering Procedia, 33, 78-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2020.21569

Wang, M., Jiang, F., Zhang, Q., & Song, S. (2014). Matching up the suspension of electric vehicle with the supporting system of battery pack. Mechanics, 20(4), 402-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.mech.20.4.6300

Özdemir, M., Erdoğan, E. O., (2023). Determination of optimal battery locations for ride comfort in electric automobiles using a nonlinear half-vehicle suspension model. Journal of The Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 39-1 (2024) 339-350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1181623

Aydın, Ş. (2006). Yapı çeliğinin (St52-3) MIG/MAG Kaynağında gaz karışımlarının dayanımı özelliklerine etkisi. Trakya Univ J Sci, 7(1), 9-15.

Şafak, D. (2001). Plastik enjeksiyon kalıplarının tasarım bakımından incelenmesi ve uygulamalı tasarım örneği (Doctoral dissertation).

Sundaram, S. K., Bahrath, A.G., Aravid, B. (2022). Influence of target dynamics and number of impacts on ballistic performance of 6061-T6 and 7075-T6 aluminum alloy targets. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 50(3), 993-1011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2020.1738245

Maslavi, A., Hüseyin, Ü., Kaştan, A. (2022). Burç ve Yatak Uygulamaları için Saf Poli-eter-eter-keton Polimer ve Karbon Elyaf Takviyeli Poli-eter-eter-keton Kompozitin Sürtünme ve Aşınma Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması. Journal of Materials and Mechatronics: A, 3(2), 137-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55546/jmm.1100365