Microstrip Reflectarray Design for 26 GHz
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper presents microstrip reflectarray design using variable size unit cell approach for 26 GHz, and investigates the effect of feed antenna distance to the surface. The unit cell structure is made up of a 1.5 mm foam layer (εr=1.37) and a 0.787 mm substrate layer (εr=2.2) between the ground and reflective layers. Two arrays of 14λx14λ in size were designed to reflect the incoming wave in the θ=25º direction; the distance to the feed was 160 mm in one design and 320 mm in the other design. Simulation results show gain of 30.2 dBi for the former and 29.8 dBi for the latter. 3-dB gain bandwidths were 11 % and 14 %, respectively
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
D. Gunduz, D. B. Kurka, M. Jankowski, M. M. Amiri, E. Ozfatura, and S. Sreekumar, “Communicate to Learn at the Edge,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 14–19, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.001.2000394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2000394
J. Zhao, “A Survey of Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces (IRSs): Towards 6G Wireless Communication Networks,” Jul. 2019, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04789
M. Chen, Z. Yang, W. Saad, C. Yin, H. V. Poor, and S. Cui, “A Joint Learning and Communications Framework for Federated Learning over Wireless Networks,” IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 269–283, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TWC.2020.3024629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2020.3024629
S. Gong et al., “Toward Smart Wireless Communications via Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces: A Contemporary Survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2283–2314, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2020.3004197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2020.3004197
O. Ozdemir, F. Erden, I. Guvenc, T. Yekan, and T. Zarian, “28 GHz mmWave Channel Measurements: A Comparison of Horn and Phased Array Antennas and Coverage Enhancement Using Passive and Active Repeaters,” Jan. 2020, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.00121
H. Zhao et al., “28 GHz Millimeter Wave Cellular Communication Measurements for Reflection and Penetration Loss in and around Buildings,” 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2013.6655403
O. Ozdogan, E. Bjornson, and E. G. Larsson, “Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces: Physics, Propagation, and Pathloss Modeling,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 581–585, May 2020, doi: 10.1109/LWC.2019.2960779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/LWC.2019.2960779
G. C. Trichopoulos et al., “Design and Evaluation of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces in Real-World Environment,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 3, pp. 462–474, 2022, doi: 10.1109/OJCOMS.2022.3158310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCOMS.2022.3158310
M. ALHENNAWİ and H. G. CLARKE, “Designing Wideband Microstrip Reflectarrays for 10 GHz,” European Journal of Science and Technology, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.31590/ejosat.1040838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1040838
“CST STUDIO SUITE. ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD SIMULATION SOFTWARE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD SIMULATION SOFTWARE, 2021.”