Analysis of OPC Data Using Federated Learning: An Evaluation of Performance and Privacy
Süleyman Burak Altınışık
trex Dijital Akıllı Üretim Sistemleri A.Ş.
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0987-1798
Turgay Tugay Bilgin
Bursa Technical University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9245-5728
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56038/oprd.v5i1.574
Keywords: Federated Learning (FL), Operational Performance Control (OPC), Data Privacy, Industrial Automation, Predictive Maintenance
Abstract
This study examines the benefits of applying federated learning (FL) technology to OPC (Operational Performance Control) systems within industrial automation and data analysis processes. FL enables each production facility to process its data locally while only transmitting model parameters to a central server, thereby preserving data privacy. This approach provides significant advantages in industrial environments, particularly concerning data privacy and communication costs. The study evaluates FL's potential to ensure data privacy, reduce communication costs, improve efficiency in training time, and deliver high performance in predictive maintenance and quality estimation. Model performance was analyzed using accuracy, F1 score, precision, and loss metrics; the results demonstrated that FL achieved a 90% accuracy rate, offering competitive performance compared to centralized modeling. In predictive maintenance and quality analysis specifically, FL achieved 85-88% accuracy while reducing network data load by 65%. These findings validate that FL provides a secure, cost-effective, and efficient solution for industrial data analysis processes by eliminating the need for centralized data collection. In conclusion, FL and OPC integration supports data privacy, cost savings, and communication efficiency in industrial processes. The study highlights that FL could become a prevalent technology in industrial data analysis, establishing a new standard particularly in digital manufacturing processes.
References
Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., ... & Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and trends® in machine learning, 14(1–2), 1-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000083
McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & y Arcas, B. A. (2017, April). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Artificial intelligence and statistics (pp. 1273-1282). PMLR.
Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019). Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 10(2), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3298981
Bonawitz, K. (2019). Towards federated learning at scale: Syste m design. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.01046.
Garcia, J. M., Jeschke, S., Brecher, C., Song, H., & Rawat, D. B. (2017). Industrial Internet of Things: Challenges and Research Roadmap. In S. Jeschke, C. Brecher, H. Song, & D. B. Rawat (Eds.), Industrial Internet of Things: Cybermanufacturing Systems (pp. 70-405). Springer DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42559-7
Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017). Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems: New findings and approaches, 85-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4
Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing letters, 3, 18-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001
Xu, H., Yu, W., Griffith, D., & Golmie, N. (2018). A survey on industrial Internet of Things: A cyber-physical systems perspective. Ieee access, 6, 78238-78259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2884906
Shokri, R., & Shmatikov, V. (2015, October). Privacy-preserving deep learning. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security (pp. 1310-1321). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2810103.2813687
Jardine, A. K., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical systems and signal processing, 20(7), 1483-1510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012
Nilsson, A., Smith, S., Ulm, G., Gustavsson, E., & Jirstrand, M. (2018, December). A performance evaluation of federated learning algorithms. In Proceedings of the second workshop on distributed infrastructures for deep learning (pp. 1-8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3286490.3286559
Mobley, R. K. (2002). An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance. Elsevier Science google schola, 2, 485-520.
Sattler, F., Müller, K. R., & Samek, W. (2020). Clustered federated learning: Model-agnostic distributed multitask optimization under privacy constraints. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 32(8), 3710-3722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3015958
Hard, A., Rao, K., Mathews, R., Ramaswamy, S., Beaufays, F., Augenstein, S., ... & Ramage, D. (2018). Federated learning for mobile keyboard prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03604.
Geyer, R. C., Klein, T., & Nabi, M. (2017). Differentially private federated learning: A client level perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.07557.
Konečný, J. (2016). Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05492.
Nguyen, D. C., Ding, M., Pathirana, P. N., Seneviratne, A., Li, J., Niyato, D., & Poor, H. V. (2021). Federated learning for industrial internet of things in future industries. IEEE Wireless Communications, 28(6), 192-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.001.2100102
Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Zaheer, M., Sanjabi, M., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated optimization in heterogeneous networks. Proceedings of Machine learning and systems, 2, 429-450.