The Place of Cultural Economy in Development Policies of Developing Countries: Van Province

Main Article Content

Gulcinay Basdogan Deniz
Zeynep Şirin Enlil


Van city has serious socio-economic cultural development problems. Despite these problems, Van's cultural and natural diversity, as well as its potential to be an important commercial center due to its geopolitical situation, are important for the solution of extant problems. In this regard, this paper strives to examine the challenges of Van from the cultural aspect. Accordingly; in Van, the investments determined by the actors affecting the development and planning process periodically (2003-2016) were evaluated vis-à-vis the classification of cultural economy and human development index. Content analysis was used in the research. The European Union (EU) is one of the international actors in Van and the national actors are; Ministry of Development, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Culture and Tourism, T.C. Prime Ministry General Directorate of Foundations, Eastern Anatolia Project (EAP) Regional Development Administration, Eastern Anatolia Development Agency (EADA) and Municipalities. It is seen that these are important actors in development policies and the investments they have made coincide with the strategies they have targeted. International actors prioritize social and human development investments within the framework of EU regional development policies. National actors however followed both a development model within the scope of industry, trade and services, which was predominantly based on the economic perspective, and a development model from the tourism perspective in the services class. Consequently, it is seen that development in Van is not directly evaluated from the cultural view, but evaluated together with tourism, culture is instrumentalized for tourism and cultural tourism is brought to the fore and cultural policies are developed from the tourism perspective.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Basdogan Deniz, G., & Şirin Enlil, Z. (2022). The Place of Cultural Economy in Development Policies of Developing Countries: Van Province. The European Journal of Research and Development, 2(2), 352–382.


Eser, K. & Gökmen, Ç.E. (2009). Beşeri sermayenin ekonomik gelişme üzerindeki etkileri: dünya deneyimi ve Türkiye üzerine gözlemler. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 1(2), 41-56.

Manga, M. Bal, H. Algan, N. & Kandır, E.D. (2015). Beşeri sermaye, fiziksel sermaye ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: BRICS ülkeleri ve Türkiye örneği. Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences Journal, 24(1), 45-60.

Palabıyık, A. (2011). Pierre Bourdieu sosyolojisinde “habitus”, “sermaye” ve “alan” üzerine. Liberal Thought, 16 (61-61), 121- 141.

Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L. J. D. (2003). Answers for a reflective anthropology, Translated by Nazlı Ökten, İletişim Publications.

Gürses, D. (2009). Human development and Turkey. Balıkesir University Institute of Social Sciences Journal 12 (21), 339-350.

Çetin, M. (2005). Human development in Turkey: a comparative assessment. Ataturk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 19(2), 59-73.

Sen, A.K. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: the dewey lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy, 82 (4),169- 221. DOI:

Dreze, J. & Sen, A. (1995). India: economic development and social opportunity. OUP.

Baliamoune-Lutz, M.N. (2004). On the Measurement of Human Well-Being: Fuzzy Set Theory and Sen’s Capability Approach. On the Measurement of Human Wellbeing: Fuzzy Set Theory and Sen's Capability Approach, WIDER Research Paper, No. 2004/16, The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNUWIDER), Helsinki.

Gasper, D. (2000). Development as freedom: taking economics beyond commodities-the cautious boldness of Amartya Sen. Journal of International Development, 12(7), 989-1001.<989::AID-JID724>3.0.CO;2-Q DOI:<989::AID-JID724>3.0.CO;2-Q

Birdman, K. (2006). The place of social capital in workers' physical and mental health, Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Marmara University, Institute of Science and Technology.

Kangal, N. (2013). Theories of social capital and social capital development relationship: the case of Turkey. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Selçuk University, Institute of Social Sciences.

Dae-Bong, K. (2009). Human capital and its measurement, 3rd OECD World Forum on “Statistics, Knowledge and Policy” Charting Progress, Building Visions, Improving Life Busan, 27-30 October2009, Korea.

Yaylalı, M. & Lebe, F. (2011). An empirical analysis of the relationship between human capital and economic growth. Marmara University, Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 30 (1), 23-53.

Rosenzweig, M.R. (2010). Microeconomic Approaches to Development: Schooling, Learning, and Growth, New Haven: Yale University Economic Growth Center, 2010: 1-16.

Nasir, Z. M. & Hina, N. (2000). Education and Earnings in Pakistan. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Research Report No: 177.

Çalışkan, S. Karabacak, M. & Meçik, O. (2013). Education and economic growth relationship in Turkey: 1923-2011 (a quantitative approach). Journal of Management Sciences 11(21), 29-48.

Qadri, F.S. (2011). Human capital and economic growth: tiem series evidence from Pakistan. Pakistan Business Review, (1), 815-833.

UNDP, (2015). United Nations Development Program (UNDP), Human Development Report, Abstract.

UNESCO, (2009). The 2009 Unesco Framework for Cultural Statistics (FCS).

Sitas, R. (2020). Cultural policy and just cities in Africa. City, (24), 3-4, 473-492. DOI:

United Nations, (2010). Creative Economy: A Feasible Development Option. Retrieved May 8, 2013 from

Gibson, C. & Kong, L. (2005). Cultural economy: a critical review. Progress in Human Geography, 29 (5), 541-561. DOI:

Pratt, A. C. (2009). Cultural economy. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. (2), 407-410. DOI:

DCMS, (1998). Creative industries mapping document.

Landry, C. (2000). The creative city: a toolkit for urban innovators. Earthscan. DOI:

Florida, R.L. (2002). The rise of the creative class: and how it is transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Basic Books.

UNCTAD, (2008). Creative Economy Report. Retrieved May 10, 2013 from 20082cer_en.pdf.

Kaymas, S. (2020). Yaratıcı endüstriler, kültür temelli girişimcilik ve eleştirel ekonomi politik: kör noktayı yeniden düşünmek. İnsan ve İnsan, 7(26), 93-113. DOI:

Dörry, S. Rosol, M. & Thissen, F. (2016). The significance of creative industry policy narratives for Zurich's transformation toward a post-industrial city. Cities (58), 137–142. DOI:

Aksoy, A. & Enlil, Z. (2011). Cultural economics inventory. İstanbul Bilgi University Publications.

Durmaz, B. (2012). Creative clusters and place‐making: analyzing the quality of place in Soho and Beyoğlu. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. The University of Nottingham, Department of Architecture and The Built Environment.

Evans, G. (2001). Cultural planning: an urban renaissance. Routledge. DOI:

Evans, G. & Shaw, P. (2004). The Contribution of culture to regeneration in the UK: a review of the evidence. UK: Department of Culture, Media and Sport.

Evans, G. (2005). Measure for measure: evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5-6): 959 -983. DOI:

Montgomery, J. (2004). Cultural quarters as mechanisms for urban regeneration. part 2: a review of four cultural quarters in the UK, Ireland and Australia. Planning Practice & Research, 19(1), 3-31. DOI:

Mommaas, H. (2004). Cultural clusters and the post-industrial city: towards the remapping of urban cultural policy. Urban Studies, 41(3), 507-532. DOI:

Seisdedos, G. & Vaggione, P. (2005). The city branding processes: the case of Madrid, 41st ISoCaRP Congress 2005.

Peker, A. F. (2006). The Role of Contemporary Art Museums in the Branding Process of the City: Urban Branding and Cultural Landmark, Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. İstanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology.

Kavaratzis, M. & Ashworth, G.J. (2005). City branding: an effective assertion of identity or a marketing trick? tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(5), 506-514. DOI:

Perry, B. Agerb, L. & Sitasc, R. (2020). Cultural heritage entanglements: festivals as integrative sites for sustainable urban development. International Journal Of Heritage Studies 2020, 26(6), 603–618. DOI:

Jones, A. (2017). Regenerating urban waterfronts—creating better futures—from commercial and leisure market places to cultural quarters and innovation districts. Planning Practice & Research, 32(3), 333-344. DOI:

Ferilli, G. Sacco, P.L. Blessi, G.T. & Forbici, S. (2017). Power to the people: when culture works as a social catalyst in urban regeneration processes (and when it does not). European Planning Studies, 25(2), 241–258. DOI:

Montgomery, J. (2003). Cultural quarters as mechanisms for urban regeneration. part 1: conceptualizing cultural quarters. Planning, Practice & Research, 18(4), 293–306. DOI:

Bianchini, F. & Parkinson, M. (1993). Cultural policy and urban regeneration: The West European experience. Manchester University Press.

Kim, J.Y. (2016). Cultural entrepreneurs and urban regeneration in Itaewon, Seoul. Cities (56), 132–140. DOI:

Grodach, C. O'Connor, J. & Gibson, C. (2017). Manufacturing and cultural production: towards a progressive policy agenda for the cultural economy. City, Culture and Society (10), 17–25. DOI:

Douglass, M. (2016). Creative communities and the cultural economy Insadong, chaebol urbanism and the local state in Seoul. Cities 856), 148–155. DOI:

Ferilli, G. Sacco, P. L. & Tavano Blessi, G. (2012). Cities as creative hubs: from instrumental to functional values of culture-led local development. In L. F. Girard, & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Sustainable city and creativity: Promoting creative urban initiatives (pp. 110–124). Ashgate.

EADA, (2015). Vision 2023: Van City and Districts Vision 2023 Common Mind Strategic Action Plan. _van_eylem.pdf.

TUİK, (2021). Turkey Statistical Institute. Regional statistics.

Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, (2), 8-14. DOI:

Crabtree, B. F. & Miller, W. L. (1999). Doing qualitative research. Sage Publications.

Merriam, S. B., and Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Baltacı, A. (2019). Nitel araştırma süreci: nitel bir araştırma nasıl yapılır? Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (AEÜSBED), 5(2), 368-388. DOI:

Başdoğan Deniz, G. & Enlil, Z. (2021). The importance of cultural economy in regional development policies: TRB2 Region and Van city. lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education, (44), 235-252 . DOI:

Neuman, W. L. (2012). Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri: Nicel ve Nitel Yaklaşımlar I-II. Cilt (5. Basım). Yayın Odası.

Karataş, Z. (2015). sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştirma yöntemleri. Sosyal Hizmet E-Dergi Manevi Temelli Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 62-80.

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.

INTELI, (2011). Creative-based strategies in small and mediumsized cities: Guidelines for local authorities. Final output of the URBACT project “Creative Clusters in urban areas of low density”. INTELI Technical ActionPlan.

Mushkin, S.J. (1962). Health as an investment. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 70, No. 5, Part 2: 129-157. DOI:

Schultz T.W., (1968). Education and economic growth: return to education, readings in the economics of education, UNESCO.

Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics (22), 3-42. DOI:

Sab, R.S. & Smith S. (2001). Human capital: international evidence. IMF Working Paper, No. 32. DOI:

EAP, (2014). EAP Administration 2014 Annual Report, Erzurum.

EADA, (2015a). Eastern Anatolia Development Agency Support Programs.

EAP, (2015). EAP Administration 2015 Annual Report, Erzurum.